sammas
07-08 12:13 PM
No I did not. The instructions said, I don't have to send photos.
That is the reason, they asked me to appear for bio-metrics which I did.
Probably the RFE might be related to photos not being sent. A friend of mine received a RFE for not sending the photos eventhough they are not required to be sent but he did not get any Biometrics notice.
After the photos were sent, the application was approved.
That is the reason, they asked me to appear for bio-metrics which I did.
Probably the RFE might be related to photos not being sent. A friend of mine received a RFE for not sending the photos eventhough they are not required to be sent but he did not get any Biometrics notice.
After the photos were sent, the application was approved.
wallpaper sexy angel wings tattoos
gc_aspirant_prasad
09-19 09:06 AM
It was truly awesome. Got to talk to two congressmen - helped clarify differences between Legal v/s Illegal immigrants, H1 cap issues v/s GC issues, got almost half an hour at each office. Thanks IV for this opportunity, has helped me grow as a person.
polapragada
10-14 01:09 PM
2 months movement for for EB2-I to June 2003. EB3-I 3 months.
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html
India
E1 Current
E2 1 June 2003
E3 1 October 2001
Let us hope dates move forward in December.
Now a days INDIA is faster than US;)
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html
India
E1 Current
E2 1 June 2003
E3 1 October 2001
Let us hope dates move forward in December.
Now a days INDIA is faster than US;)
2011 Angel Wings Tattoo Designs
rakesh_one
04-07 03:28 PM
Read this!!!!! they did not use all the recaptured visas from last time
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/LPR_FR_2007.pdf
The large num-ber of LPRs in the employment preferences in 2005 was primarily due to the American Competitiveness in the 21 Century Act of st2000 (AC21). This Act resulted in the recapture of 130,107 unused employment-based visa numbers from 1999 and 2000 to be made available to first, second, and third preference employment-based immigrants once the annual limit had been reached. Approximately 94,000 of those recaptured visa numbers were used in 2005, none were used in 2006, and 7,312 were used in 2007.
In 2007, the number of employment-based preference immigrants exceeded the above limit. This was due to provisions of the REAL ID Act of 2005
that allowed the recapture of 50,000 unused employment-based
visas (4,743 of these visas were used in 2007) and provisions of the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act of 2000 that
permitted the recapture of 130,107 visas (7,312 of these visas were used in 2007).
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/LPR_FR_2007.pdf
The large num-ber of LPRs in the employment preferences in 2005 was primarily due to the American Competitiveness in the 21 Century Act of st2000 (AC21). This Act resulted in the recapture of 130,107 unused employment-based visa numbers from 1999 and 2000 to be made available to first, second, and third preference employment-based immigrants once the annual limit had been reached. Approximately 94,000 of those recaptured visa numbers were used in 2005, none were used in 2006, and 7,312 were used in 2007.
In 2007, the number of employment-based preference immigrants exceeded the above limit. This was due to provisions of the REAL ID Act of 2005
that allowed the recapture of 50,000 unused employment-based
visas (4,743 of these visas were used in 2007) and provisions of the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act of 2000 that
permitted the recapture of 130,107 visas (7,312 of these visas were used in 2007).
more...
stucklabor
04-14 10:55 AM
That is a good sentiment, Bkam.
Please don't mistake BerkeleyBee's post. From the point of view of the core team, many posters have ideas that seem correct to them and they post 'This is my idea, why can't we do this?'. In plain language, that translates to 'Why can't the core team do this?'.
So from my point of view - simply as someone who has been posting for a long time in Usenet, newsgroups etc - if you have a good idea, implement it yourself. E.g., if you want a webfax that thanks Senators, write the webfax and post it. Sample webfaxes are available on the website, customize it and post it. The "core team" is human. We are balancing full time jobs with the web site and it would help if people making suggestions also implemented it.
In this idea that has been posted re: educating people in other countries, that is NOT part of IV's mission. IV's mission is clear: it is social service to people that want to get a green card. It is also social service to educate prospective immigrants about the delays in the GC process. However, that is not part of IV's mission. It can be part of Bkam's and Learning01's personal missions, however.
I think the one additional thing is also that we need to using harsh terms to blame the U.S. system or Congress for our problems. Lots of people have problems, Congress has limited time to tackle everyone's problems. As someone prominent that we met said 'War on terror, injustice to immigrants.. You know what is going to win every time'. So let us keep perspective and soldier on, remember we are also getting prominent, so now is the time to present ourselves and the forum in the best light possible.
Please don't mistake BerkeleyBee's post. From the point of view of the core team, many posters have ideas that seem correct to them and they post 'This is my idea, why can't we do this?'. In plain language, that translates to 'Why can't the core team do this?'.
So from my point of view - simply as someone who has been posting for a long time in Usenet, newsgroups etc - if you have a good idea, implement it yourself. E.g., if you want a webfax that thanks Senators, write the webfax and post it. Sample webfaxes are available on the website, customize it and post it. The "core team" is human. We are balancing full time jobs with the web site and it would help if people making suggestions also implemented it.
In this idea that has been posted re: educating people in other countries, that is NOT part of IV's mission. IV's mission is clear: it is social service to people that want to get a green card. It is also social service to educate prospective immigrants about the delays in the GC process. However, that is not part of IV's mission. It can be part of Bkam's and Learning01's personal missions, however.
I think the one additional thing is also that we need to using harsh terms to blame the U.S. system or Congress for our problems. Lots of people have problems, Congress has limited time to tackle everyone's problems. As someone prominent that we met said 'War on terror, injustice to immigrants.. You know what is going to win every time'. So let us keep perspective and soldier on, remember we are also getting prominent, so now is the time to present ourselves and the forum in the best light possible.
bsbawa10
11-16 09:16 AM
I will support this quota only if it is for the University where I did the masters from. :)
more...
rajesh_kamisetty
04-20 10:26 PM
How about that?
2010 tribal cross amp; wings tattoo
amsgc
06-20 02:26 PM
Dude,
The update was posted last night for members who signed up: http://groups.google.com/group/goivgaiv?hl=en
Same here. GA chapter google groups member
The update was posted last night for members who signed up: http://groups.google.com/group/goivgaiv?hl=en
Same here. GA chapter google groups member
more...
whoever
06-17 04:05 PM
i dont have a marriage certificate, can an affidavit from both parents be used instead of a marriage certificate?
hair Angel Tattoos | Angel Wings
honest123
01-27 07:59 PM
Personally I do think giving this 55,000 annual quota green cards to employment-based Science & Medicine immigrants is better than giving DV-lottery to other lucky people just win the lottery but without any high educational qualification. Also, since international students have stayed in US for long years and they have documents such as social security no. and driver licenses' to run the comprehensive background check. Therefore, it minimizes a lot of the risk to invite the criminals to immigrate.
However, I am curious whether this bill will be beneficial to all US advanced graduates in Science & Medicine or not. I know some new H-1B workers in those advanced degrees may NOT be the EB-type and they need to wait for certain years and then the employers will sponsor them green cards as the EB-category. And if the employers don't sponsor them green cards due to companies' merging different departments or for other accidental reason, they will lose their green cards.
Also, some advanced graduates in Science & Medicine cannot get the H-1B working visa smoothly due to H-1B quota is full and need to leave US and some of them can't get the
H-1B extension and need to leave US. Or some of them got laid off during their employment period due to merge of 2 companies and if they can't find another employer, they need to leave US too.
Therefore, if they can't get into the EB category, this bill cannot help them out!! Personally I do think if to allow all those advanced graduates in Science & Medicine to enroll online by "first come, first served basis" and once the 55,000 quota is filled, then they need to wait for the next year to immigrate. This will be fair and can retain all those US advanced gradudates in Science & Medicine who are graduated in different years with different luck to get the H-1B working visa.
However, I am curious whether this bill will be beneficial to all US advanced graduates in Science & Medicine or not. I know some new H-1B workers in those advanced degrees may NOT be the EB-type and they need to wait for certain years and then the employers will sponsor them green cards as the EB-category. And if the employers don't sponsor them green cards due to companies' merging different departments or for other accidental reason, they will lose their green cards.
Also, some advanced graduates in Science & Medicine cannot get the H-1B working visa smoothly due to H-1B quota is full and need to leave US and some of them can't get the
H-1B extension and need to leave US. Or some of them got laid off during their employment period due to merge of 2 companies and if they can't find another employer, they need to leave US too.
Therefore, if they can't get into the EB category, this bill cannot help them out!! Personally I do think if to allow all those advanced graduates in Science & Medicine to enroll online by "first come, first served basis" and once the 55,000 quota is filled, then they need to wait for the next year to immigrate. This will be fair and can retain all those US advanced gradudates in Science & Medicine who are graduated in different years with different luck to get the H-1B working visa.
more...
delhirocks
07-11 04:55 PM
Dependents don't need SS# to file. Only primary applicant is required to have SSN.
You need either a SSN or a TIN to claim someone as a dependent. (Iam not sure if it applies to kids, but surely to adults)
You need either a SSN or a TIN to claim someone as a dependent. (Iam not sure if it applies to kids, but surely to adults)
hot Firefighter Tattoos And
Pineapple
12-16 12:47 PM
Probably a dumb question which was answered before in some other thread.. but just so that I understand better:
Am I correct, or totally off base to say: There are no clear cut legislative guidelines regarding how cascaded visas or recaptured visas are to be used especially w.r.t country limits. USCIS has the discretion in how these visas are to be handed out..
If so, how has USCIS handed out these visas historically?
None. USCIS has descrition on it and it has choses that to be the case.
Am I correct, or totally off base to say: There are no clear cut legislative guidelines regarding how cascaded visas or recaptured visas are to be used especially w.r.t country limits. USCIS has the discretion in how these visas are to be handed out..
If so, how has USCIS handed out these visas historically?
None. USCIS has descrition on it and it has choses that to be the case.
more...
house Wings amp; Banner Tattoo
SEP03NY
09-18 06:45 PM
They have extended my and my wife for 8 years more upto 2014.
Thanxs
Thanxs
tattoo angel wings tattoo designs
saikatmandal
08-26 01:04 AM
I live in western suburbs of Chicago, IL
Anyone from IL chapter going to the Sept 18 DC rally ?
Cheers !
Anyone from IL chapter going to the Sept 18 DC rally ?
Cheers !
more...
pictures American eagle wings hangs
lostinbeta
12-31 01:34 AM
Owned Dan... no, I think I became someones beeyotch in this battle...LOL.
But yes... next time you and I will OWN ALL!!!!!!!
:bad: :bad: :bad: :evil: :evil: :evil:
But yes... next time you and I will OWN ALL!!!!!!!
:bad: :bad: :bad: :evil: :evil: :evil:
dresses Eagle Wings Tattoo. Wing tattoo bone; Wing tattoo bone
pappu
03-31 10:49 AM
Action Alert: Please give your 1 minute to IV for media work
Please click the link below
http://immigrationvoice.capwiz.com/immigrationvoice/issues/?style=D& Under the media section, please click on the first item: Highly Skilled Professionals Call on Congress to Pass Green Card Reforms
http://capwiz.com/immigrationvoice/issues/alert/?alertid=38882501
Enter your zipcode, select the local and national newspapers you want to send this message to and hit go.
Please help post this press release to media so that they become aware of our issues and can reach out to us for any coverage or information about this issue.
Please click the link below
http://immigrationvoice.capwiz.com/immigrationvoice/issues/?style=D& Under the media section, please click on the first item: Highly Skilled Professionals Call on Congress to Pass Green Card Reforms
http://capwiz.com/immigrationvoice/issues/alert/?alertid=38882501
Enter your zipcode, select the local and national newspapers you want to send this message to and hit go.
Please help post this press release to media so that they become aware of our issues and can reach out to us for any coverage or information about this issue.
more...
makeup 2011 angel wings tattoos.
ram_ram
09-29 08:00 PM
May2 2006.eb2 still waiting
girlfriend next tattoo is important.
gene77
10-19 01:54 PM
My case is exactly like yours ....
1st 140 under EB3 PD Oct 04
2nd 140 under EB2 still pending, requested for EB3 PD Oct 04 to be ported - awaiting porting results.
However, since your 485 is already filed with a EB3 I140, you are requested USCIS to 'link' (for lack of better words) the new EB2 I140 with your pending I485. Per my interpretation of what I have read in Matthew Oh's website (I'll post later) and Perarson's memo, we can request this interlinking only when the PD for our 2nd I140 is current.
However your lawyer suggests differently - which may be fine and may work just as well. In fact, if your case works, then I won't wait for my PD to be current either and will interfile immediately after approval of my I-140.
here is where my confusion lies....I'm sure you must have this also.
This posting involves aliens who are waiting for the I-485 applications where the underlying I-140 petition was approved but due to retrogression, I-485 cannot be approved. Most of these cases are EB-3 cases. When the same alien obtains an EB-2 labor certification approval through the same employer or a different employer and the visa number is available for the EB-2 for him or her, he should be eligible for filing another I-485 application based on the visa number available EB-2 I-140 petition. This can be achieved either by concurrent I-140/I-485 filing or if the new EB-2 I-140 has already been approved, by filing of stand-alone I-485 application.
� However, in the foregoing situation, the Pearson Memo of 2000 allows the alien to transfer the pending I-485 application from the existing underlying approved I-140 petition to a new EB-2 I-140 petition such that the alien does not have to file another I-485 application to use the second I-140 petition. For this to happen, two conditions must be met: (1) The existing underlying I-140 petition (most likely EB-3) must have been approved before the I-485 transfer is requested. (2) Secondly, the visa number must be "current" for the new I-140 petition (most likely EB-2) before the I-485 transfer is requested. Inasmuch as the visa number is current, the pending I-485 application that suffer from the visa number retrogression can be transferred to the next I-140 petition.
Please share this with your attorney and update the forum members of their response.
Gene.
1st 140 under EB3 PD Oct 04
2nd 140 under EB2 still pending, requested for EB3 PD Oct 04 to be ported - awaiting porting results.
However, since your 485 is already filed with a EB3 I140, you are requested USCIS to 'link' (for lack of better words) the new EB2 I140 with your pending I485. Per my interpretation of what I have read in Matthew Oh's website (I'll post later) and Perarson's memo, we can request this interlinking only when the PD for our 2nd I140 is current.
However your lawyer suggests differently - which may be fine and may work just as well. In fact, if your case works, then I won't wait for my PD to be current either and will interfile immediately after approval of my I-140.
here is where my confusion lies....I'm sure you must have this also.
This posting involves aliens who are waiting for the I-485 applications where the underlying I-140 petition was approved but due to retrogression, I-485 cannot be approved. Most of these cases are EB-3 cases. When the same alien obtains an EB-2 labor certification approval through the same employer or a different employer and the visa number is available for the EB-2 for him or her, he should be eligible for filing another I-485 application based on the visa number available EB-2 I-140 petition. This can be achieved either by concurrent I-140/I-485 filing or if the new EB-2 I-140 has already been approved, by filing of stand-alone I-485 application.
� However, in the foregoing situation, the Pearson Memo of 2000 allows the alien to transfer the pending I-485 application from the existing underlying approved I-140 petition to a new EB-2 I-140 petition such that the alien does not have to file another I-485 application to use the second I-140 petition. For this to happen, two conditions must be met: (1) The existing underlying I-140 petition (most likely EB-3) must have been approved before the I-485 transfer is requested. (2) Secondly, the visa number must be "current" for the new I-140 petition (most likely EB-2) before the I-485 transfer is requested. Inasmuch as the visa number is current, the pending I-485 application that suffer from the visa number retrogression can be transferred to the next I-140 petition.
Please share this with your attorney and update the forum members of their response.
Gene.
hairstyles Eagle tattoo art design
bhatt
04-16 11:33 PM
Just want to share the info that I have received the Permanent residency approval notice Y'day.
Have been here in us for more than 10 years. No more h1b renewals/ stamping, DL renewal issues/ EAD issues etc etc.
Have been here in us for more than 10 years. No more h1b renewals/ stamping, DL renewal issues/ EAD issues etc etc.
CADude
12-21 03:25 PM
Post your IT recruiter number here. Many of my friends are looking for jobs. When anyone out and looking then they will feel job market like my many friends. So don't brag and hold on your job otherwise will learn hard way. :)
Hello friends,
Of late everybody is talking about bad economy. I mean its all over the TV and newspapers. Apparently we are in a recession since past one year (since Dec 2007).
However, odd it may though sound, I don't see any real economic slowdown in IT sector. I mean all my friends and acquaintances in IT industry in the US and India are retaining their jobs. I recently talked to my IT recruiter and she told me that as far as she is concerned this year has been like any other years. Bit sluggish at the year end, but loads of requirements lined up for January next year.
Am I the only one who is feeling this way, or others also sensing the same thing. Maybe the real jolts are still lying in the future, in the coming year. Or may be its just a hoax. I would love to know other people's observation on this strange anomaly between what is being reported in the media, and what is being observed on the ground.
Hello friends,
Of late everybody is talking about bad economy. I mean its all over the TV and newspapers. Apparently we are in a recession since past one year (since Dec 2007).
However, odd it may though sound, I don't see any real economic slowdown in IT sector. I mean all my friends and acquaintances in IT industry in the US and India are retaining their jobs. I recently talked to my IT recruiter and she told me that as far as she is concerned this year has been like any other years. Bit sluggish at the year end, but loads of requirements lined up for January next year.
Am I the only one who is feeling this way, or others also sensing the same thing. Maybe the real jolts are still lying in the future, in the coming year. Or may be its just a hoax. I would love to know other people's observation on this strange anomaly between what is being reported in the media, and what is being observed on the ground.
pappu
05-30 06:19 PM
what a shame...
how dumb must someone be to get banned from a free website..;-)
You are also on the radar.
Here are some of your sample messages to other members.
IV has better things to do to help its members and this cause than tolerate members who are disrespectful to others and do not bother about this effort.
Let other IV members judge for themselves what is right and what is wrong.
chuteya!~!!
CHUTEYA!
cry baby!
dumb
retarded!
MUMMY SE POOCHNA..DHAKKAN
dumass!
IV is a ripoff!
how dumb must someone be to get banned from a free website..;-)
You are also on the radar.
Here are some of your sample messages to other members.
IV has better things to do to help its members and this cause than tolerate members who are disrespectful to others and do not bother about this effort.
Let other IV members judge for themselves what is right and what is wrong.
chuteya!~!!
CHUTEYA!
cry baby!
dumb
retarded!
MUMMY SE POOCHNA..DHAKKAN
dumass!
IV is a ripoff!
No comments:
Post a Comment