piyu7444
04-23 02:09 AM
First thing is why members have found that title is scary? I dont think it is scary......it might attract your attention. Probably most of people who got scared might be using EAD or are considering using it
I think using AC21 does not imply that 485 will be denied. In a hypothetical situation lets assume it is denied we need to find why it is being denied? One can always switch to h1b (with previous employer - should be valid when AOS is denied) by going to home country and getting h1b stamp on passport but even before you have to do it you can appeal in court and you will be able to stay here.
I was discussing the same issue today with Ron Gotcher ( you can find it on his website as I have the same userid) and he said unless you are inadmissible or commit a fraud or have broken immigration law in past AOS is not denied. Just in case if you have done any of the above three things then your AOS can be denied and you can not even get any type of non immigrant visa.......... For using AC21 just make sure that:
140 is approved Your GC sponsor will not revoke 140Your GC job description and new EAD job description are same or similar (title does not matter) . ONet code for both the jobs match. If you ensure the above things then there is no issue using EAD for a job after 180 day of filing 485. Hope this helps and people who got scared does not gives me red dots for speaking aloud.
Support IV and make the difference for yourself and everyone else in the immigrant community.
I think using AC21 does not imply that 485 will be denied. In a hypothetical situation lets assume it is denied we need to find why it is being denied? One can always switch to h1b (with previous employer - should be valid when AOS is denied) by going to home country and getting h1b stamp on passport but even before you have to do it you can appeal in court and you will be able to stay here.
I was discussing the same issue today with Ron Gotcher ( you can find it on his website as I have the same userid) and he said unless you are inadmissible or commit a fraud or have broken immigration law in past AOS is not denied. Just in case if you have done any of the above three things then your AOS can be denied and you can not even get any type of non immigrant visa.......... For using AC21 just make sure that:
140 is approved Your GC sponsor will not revoke 140Your GC job description and new EAD job description are same or similar (title does not matter) . ONet code for both the jobs match. If you ensure the above things then there is no issue using EAD for a job after 180 day of filing 485. Hope this helps and people who got scared does not gives me red dots for speaking aloud.
Support IV and make the difference for yourself and everyone else in the immigrant community.
wallpaper black prom dresses 2011
nrk
05-13 09:40 AM
If it goes to Dec 2005 in Sept 2010 (optimistic) for me, pessimistic would be June 2005
July--->Sep 2010 will go to Dec 2005 (pessimistic) or Apr 2006 (Optimistic)
July--->Sep 2010 will go to Dec 2005 (pessimistic) or Apr 2006 (Optimistic)
Steven-T
February 3rd, 2004, 09:49 AM
I think the Kodak has alot more problems than just AA problems!!!
And any time a product drops by 50% in 1 year its normally not a good sign
Scott
I played around with the 14n at Adorama. Also I have been at DPR Kodak forum gathering user experiences. For its price, its a great camera for its targeted purpose.
There are two problems for me. There can be major magenta fringing at back-lighting and low light conditions (What will happen for shooting one hour before sun rise and after sun set?). You must shoot raw and do significant digital dark room work.
Complaint: Even the D70 has spot metering, 1/500 x-synch, 30 - 1 / 8000. Cmon, Canon, at least put the d*mn spot-metering on the 10D-II (if not 12mp, FF, ... for $999.00)
Steven
And any time a product drops by 50% in 1 year its normally not a good sign
Scott
I played around with the 14n at Adorama. Also I have been at DPR Kodak forum gathering user experiences. For its price, its a great camera for its targeted purpose.
There are two problems for me. There can be major magenta fringing at back-lighting and low light conditions (What will happen for shooting one hour before sun rise and after sun set?). You must shoot raw and do significant digital dark room work.
Complaint: Even the D70 has spot metering, 1/500 x-synch, 30 - 1 / 8000. Cmon, Canon, at least put the d*mn spot-metering on the 10D-II (if not 12mp, FF, ... for $999.00)
Steven
2011 prom dresses 2011(China
chanduv23
11-12 02:24 PM
This is encouraging. chandu, I read somewhere (mostly on murhty) that CIS will be publishing new AC21 soon and it is expected to be more stricter. Is this just the speculation or any other indications are received?? any idea? I am afraid that what will happen to people who already have used AC21 by following what currently exists???????
Please post any link where it says it is stricter or any new stuff USCIS wants to implement
Please post any link where it says it is stricter or any new stuff USCIS wants to implement
more...
sands_14
04-07 12:24 PM
All we can do is request and lobby.If senate feels right,they can pass a legislation.We can ask and lobby for it at least.
As it turns out,even EAD is not helpful as it has several issues which dont give you the total independence to do what you intend to.
As it turns out,even EAD is not helpful as it has several issues which dont give you the total independence to do what you intend to.
ScratchingHead
10-01 01:17 PM
I stopped traveling through countries that impose transit visa; Eventually, transit visa requirement will be lifted, if no one flies.
Great, Gave you a green. I too avoid these countries.
Great, Gave you a green. I too avoid these countries.
more...
gcformeornot
10-19 06:40 AM
------------
2010 B5618 applique prom dresses
Dj-Studios
05-21 11:04 AM
Looks graet. I'll try to put out something by Sat night if I can.
more...
crazyAbtUS
11-28 01:09 PM
Hi guys
on weekend i got email abt my I140 has RFE.Message saying they mailed on Nov14.i am expecting letter to attorny or emplyer in 2 weeks.
My pd is 2002 Dec. and my Company got merged last year to new company, i have 3year degree and 1plus year diploma which is equal to B.S computer science, when my employer did Education Evalution.
I am expecting 2 Queries
1) when company merge they may ask Company tax returns for current year.
2) or they want again Education Evalution
Hey "gcphul", Any update buddy on you RFE ?? Also was your 140 filed by your older company (before merger) or by the new one?
Any info will be helpfull..
on weekend i got email abt my I140 has RFE.Message saying they mailed on Nov14.i am expecting letter to attorny or emplyer in 2 weeks.
My pd is 2002 Dec. and my Company got merged last year to new company, i have 3year degree and 1plus year diploma which is equal to B.S computer science, when my employer did Education Evalution.
I am expecting 2 Queries
1) when company merge they may ask Company tax returns for current year.
2) or they want again Education Evalution
Hey "gcphul", Any update buddy on you RFE ?? Also was your 140 filed by your older company (before merger) or by the new one?
Any info will be helpfull..
hair Prom dresses 2011 formal
bijualex29
09-13 02:41 PM
EAD comes to home address or Lawyers office?
more...
cableman
06-15 12:16 PM
HI,
Can any one tell me is it necessary to Get medical done by Dr. only around ur location.
Reason for asking is I live in NJ. And i got an appointemt with DR. Kim in NY as i know him through somebody else.
He is also more reasonable asking around 190/-
Thanks
You can use any civil surgeon. Go ahead to see Dr. Kim in NY.
Can any one tell me is it necessary to Get medical done by Dr. only around ur location.
Reason for asking is I live in NJ. And i got an appointemt with DR. Kim in NY as i know him through somebody else.
He is also more reasonable asking around 190/-
Thanks
You can use any civil surgeon. Go ahead to see Dr. Kim in NY.
hot prom dresses 2011
Canadian_Dream
12-03 03:53 PM
I would say:
1. Stay on H1B as long as possible. Try not to use EAD unless absolutely necessary.
2. Because of 1 above, if you switch to the new employer USCIS would know you left the previous employer. (since you will file H1B transfer).
3. I see that you have everything worked out nicely from your current employer to have 180 days for your AC-21 portability. You have to really evaluate if it is really worth going to new employer in Dec 07. (if there is enormous financial gain like pre-IPO etc)
4. There is nothing wrong in switching jobs before 180 days either on EAD or H1B but in order to play safe the best bet is to, switch on H1B after 180 days. Enjoy your paid holidays and join the new employer in 2008 with peace of mind.
Gurus,
Here is my situation:
I-140 approved - PD: May '06
I-485 filed - July 30 '07 (India)
EAD cards - Received
APs - Received
Due to a slowdown in their business, my employer is laying me off in Dec '07. I'm still short of 1 month to complete my 180 days of I-485 filling. However, they said they will not withdraw my I-140 and, to help me, will in fact keep me on their payroll until Jan '08, with my Jan '08 salary as my severance and my official status as on "paid leave". So far, so good.
I also have a job offer, and my new employer wants me to join them in Dec '07, on EAD. My question is: Can I be on officially on the payroll of two companies simultaneously on H-1B and/or EAD? If yes, do I need to inform the USCIS of my status (new employer; AC21)? My other option is to say No to the new (attractive) job offer (or to try to convince them to wait until Feb '08, which they'll likely not agree to), and and take up another job in Feb '08, on EAD / H-1B transfer, using AC21. Please advise whether I'm fine with using the first option!!
1. Stay on H1B as long as possible. Try not to use EAD unless absolutely necessary.
2. Because of 1 above, if you switch to the new employer USCIS would know you left the previous employer. (since you will file H1B transfer).
3. I see that you have everything worked out nicely from your current employer to have 180 days for your AC-21 portability. You have to really evaluate if it is really worth going to new employer in Dec 07. (if there is enormous financial gain like pre-IPO etc)
4. There is nothing wrong in switching jobs before 180 days either on EAD or H1B but in order to play safe the best bet is to, switch on H1B after 180 days. Enjoy your paid holidays and join the new employer in 2008 with peace of mind.
Gurus,
Here is my situation:
I-140 approved - PD: May '06
I-485 filed - July 30 '07 (India)
EAD cards - Received
APs - Received
Due to a slowdown in their business, my employer is laying me off in Dec '07. I'm still short of 1 month to complete my 180 days of I-485 filling. However, they said they will not withdraw my I-140 and, to help me, will in fact keep me on their payroll until Jan '08, with my Jan '08 salary as my severance and my official status as on "paid leave". So far, so good.
I also have a job offer, and my new employer wants me to join them in Dec '07, on EAD. My question is: Can I be on officially on the payroll of two companies simultaneously on H-1B and/or EAD? If yes, do I need to inform the USCIS of my status (new employer; AC21)? My other option is to say No to the new (attractive) job offer (or to try to convince them to wait until Feb '08, which they'll likely not agree to), and and take up another job in Feb '08, on EAD / H-1B transfer, using AC21. Please advise whether I'm fine with using the first option!!
more...
house 2011 New Blue Prom Dresses
ash_2005
09-25 02:25 AM
Had applied on July 19th , receipt date of July 20th.
I never received any receipt notice and today I received transfer notice
WAC....
Receipt date Sep 14th 2007
Notice Date Sep 17th 2007.
Does it mean I lost the original receipt date of July 20th which should have been ideally my receipt date.
I have a similar issue. Although my app reached on July 2, 2007, the "receipt date" on my notice shows "Aug 3, 2007" and the notice date shows "Sep 12, 2007". So, in my case too, they've not honored my original receipt date. Did you manage to get your's corrected on the receipt notice, or not worth the time/effort?
Appreciate your inputs.
I never received any receipt notice and today I received transfer notice
WAC....
Receipt date Sep 14th 2007
Notice Date Sep 17th 2007.
Does it mean I lost the original receipt date of July 20th which should have been ideally my receipt date.
I have a similar issue. Although my app reached on July 2, 2007, the "receipt date" on my notice shows "Aug 3, 2007" and the notice date shows "Sep 12, 2007". So, in my case too, they've not honored my original receipt date. Did you manage to get your's corrected on the receipt notice, or not worth the time/effort?
Appreciate your inputs.
tattoo Prom dresses 2011 have become
njboy
10-03 02:39 PM
my head's spinning
more...
pictures Prom Dresses 2011
piyu7444
04-30 07:19 PM
appealing/motion to reopen doesn't allow you to stay in USA.
If employer revokes 140 then no basis for getting h-1b extensions.
Agreed........but if you will have to go to appeals if your case is legit to be reopened/reconsidered and be approved...........for any other reason if at all its not goona be approved........you cant get any visa for USA.........hence this low probablity case will be for those who are in good standing in terms of immigration else - go back to the home country..........
If employer revokes 140 you have to show USCIS that the new job which you took is indeed same/similar and you qualify for an approved 140. I can get you more information on this but you might just want to check Ron Gotchers website for detailed information.........there are so many different situations where nuthing would happen or you just get in trouble if 140 is revoked so we cant really generalize this....
If employer revokes 140 then no basis for getting h-1b extensions.
Agreed........but if you will have to go to appeals if your case is legit to be reopened/reconsidered and be approved...........for any other reason if at all its not goona be approved........you cant get any visa for USA.........hence this low probablity case will be for those who are in good standing in terms of immigration else - go back to the home country..........
If employer revokes 140 you have to show USCIS that the new job which you took is indeed same/similar and you qualify for an approved 140. I can get you more information on this but you might just want to check Ron Gotchers website for detailed information.........there are so many different situations where nuthing would happen or you just get in trouble if 140 is revoked so we cant really generalize this....
dresses prom dresses 2011 purple.
bank_king2003
01-18 04:44 PM
This is the supervisor's information at newark airport and he is very keen to note that nobody is treated in an unprofessional manner. basically he is the manager of all CBP officer at newark
Newark International Airport Domenico Calise (973) 368-6000
please bring this incident of rude CBP officer at newark by calling above number so that they can take appropriate action against all the ill-treatment.
Thanks,
Newark International Airport Domenico Calise (973) 368-6000
please bring this incident of rude CBP officer at newark by calling above number so that they can take appropriate action against all the ill-treatment.
Thanks,
more...
makeup Mini Prom Dresses 2011
tampacoolie
07-14 07:15 PM
We can send him H1B or immigration law book to him to read it.
girlfriend Prom Dresses 2011
centaur
03-02 01:52 PM
Who is your lawyer. he is very reasonable.
Labor RIR Case from MN (Approved Recently)
Labor RIR Case from TX (Approved Recently)
Labor PERM EB3 (Approved in 2006)
Paid so far 8K
Lawyer is asking more now for
Filing I-140 - I-485 - EAD - AP (for both me and my wife)
Have I paid too much? Should I pay more to him?
Labor RIR Case from MN (Approved Recently)
Labor RIR Case from TX (Approved Recently)
Labor PERM EB3 (Approved in 2006)
Paid so far 8K
Lawyer is asking more now for
Filing I-140 - I-485 - EAD - AP (for both me and my wife)
Have I paid too much? Should I pay more to him?
hairstyles Blue Prom Dresses. 2011
perm2gc
09-27 03:03 PM
Atleast now congress should focus on issues that are really important.. Capitol Hill is
laying roads that leads no way..
laying roads that leads no way..
HopeSprings
07-12 02:25 PM
Hey guys this is interesting and useful info and AILA and AILF should take note of this.
If they approve EB3/India/APR2004 and EB2/INDIA/AUG2005 saying the dates were current on Jul1 or Jul2 , applying the same logic they can't reject applications that were files when the dates were still current. And also give fair chance to others to react between bulletins.
You are right, priderock. If indian2006 is willing, his case can be used as an example by AILF but I think we should be happy for those who got approved and spare them any more trouble.
However, looking at indian2006's case, I had one question.
If they allocated visa number on 1st July then, why was the approval done on 10th? I think in one of the earlier posts it was mentioned that they need to use it in 7 days or else return it to DOS.
If they approve EB3/India/APR2004 and EB2/INDIA/AUG2005 saying the dates were current on Jul1 or Jul2 , applying the same logic they can't reject applications that were files when the dates were still current. And also give fair chance to others to react between bulletins.
You are right, priderock. If indian2006 is willing, his case can be used as an example by AILF but I think we should be happy for those who got approved and spare them any more trouble.
However, looking at indian2006's case, I had one question.
If they allocated visa number on 1st July then, why was the approval done on 10th? I think in one of the earlier posts it was mentioned that they need to use it in 7 days or else return it to DOS.
gk_2000
01-27 02:22 PM
How many times have you met your lawmaker offices in person in the last 1 year asking for a bill?
If your answer is zero or 1, then that is the reason no bill never sees light of the day.
If our community does not go out and meet lawmakers, their plight will stay buried inside the forum threads.
One thing I was trying to find out -- who are the specific people in this committee? The answer is not readily available. Can anyone help?
If your answer is zero or 1, then that is the reason no bill never sees light of the day.
If our community does not go out and meet lawmakers, their plight will stay buried inside the forum threads.
One thing I was trying to find out -- who are the specific people in this committee? The answer is not readily available. Can anyone help?
No comments:
Post a Comment